
First time at this blog? Check out Home for details on the project and the Character Index for more of an overview of the characters.
Note: A brief return to Wells; I’ll likely return to Dark is Noon tomorrow if I don’t decide to start a new project.
The Creature (35)
Project: Television mini-series (“Wells”)
Known as: The Creature, the Golem of Flesh, Frankenstein’s monster
Real name: Chayim Freud
Group affiliation: None
Physical description: “His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful. Beautiful! Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of a pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun-white sockets in which they were set, his shrivelled complexion and straight black lips.” (From Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein)
Shelley’s fictional account of the Creature was fairly accurate. In reality he’s not as tall as she described (“only” a little under seven feet tall). His skin is also not so thin or stretched. She does capture his eyes well, however (in modern times, he often wears sunglasses). His most striking feature is he has the Hebrew word “emet” (truth) carved into his forehead (many years ago he had it tattooed over, so it looks mostly like a tattoo; a scar is still visible under it).
Personality: The Creature is lonely and nihilistic. He has attempted a few forms of suicide but the magic that animates him causes him to recover from most damage. The fact he hasn’t tried more extreme measures (e.g., complete immolation) suggests he has some sort of drive to survive. He is not cruel or destructive by nature. He does have a curiosity to see new things and go to new places but more in a “what else can I do?” than a zest for life kind of way. His nihilism means he is not particularly adverse to killing; he simply does not go out of his way to harm innocents or those who have done him no ill.
He does occasionally form attachments, but these invariably disappoint. Those who know him tend to try to exploit him in some way. Even if this doesn’t occur, staying in one place for too long tends to reveal his special nature and most humans in most of history react poorly to monsters in their midst. The rare times he has had a true friend and was isolated enough to avoid persecution he was invariably disappointed due to the fragility and limited lifespans of humans.
History: Tales of golems being created stretch back to early Jerusalem (and even before – some believe the first man, Adam, was a golem created by God). In the world of Wells, a number of Jewish mystics managed to create animated golems from dirt or clay (the Golem of Prague was a famous example of the latter). For the most part these were unintelligent creatures used to do mundane things like household chores.
A few became uncontrollable and need to be stopped. While not always easy, all golems usually had a straightforward way to return to their true, inanimate state. Some were animated by a piece of paper with the word “shem” upon it placed in the golem’s mouth; therefore, removing the paper would deactivate the golem. Others had the word “emet” impressed in their forehead (remember, clay). “Emet” meant “truth” but the removal of the aleph character would change this word to “met” meaning “death” (again deactivating the golem).
Vaschel Freud was a Jewish mystic who decided to try to create a golem. However, he did not use common materials like clay – he decided to use flesh. Combining parts from different dead bodies he created a figure and then used the ancient secrets to try to animate it. He carved “emet” into the flesh of his creation’s forehead and it indeed came to life.
Perhaps due to being made of flesh, his creation was more intelligent that its golem forebears, and Vaschel named him Chayim (“life”). However soon enough Chayim showed himself not easily controlled and further Vaschel suspected Chayim was in love with Vaschel’s wife. As a few had before him, Vaschel was challenged to deanimate his creation.
Removing the aleph from flesh proved to be a much more difficult, and grisly, challenge that it would have been for clay. To Vaschel’s horror, Chayim (or the Creature as Vaschel began to call him) would heal from most wounds, including the removal of the aleph, reanimating the creature. Vaschel worried that he had gone too far in trying to create a golem from flesh, trying to recreate Adam. For his hubris, god was punishing him.
The Creature for its part felt that Vaschel creating him was indeed a foul deed. Cursed with an existence he never asked for, the Creature was neither man nor god but somewhere in between. What Vaschel read as a romantic love for his wife was the Creature seeking a connection and a mother figure. He felt ill treated by Vaschel indeed – going from unwanted life granted by Vaschel to Vaschel attempting to destroy him.
The Creature killed a number of Vaschel’s family members, including his wife. To save his children, Vaschel desperately tried a final gambit. Managing to remove the aleph again, he booked passage for himself and the Creature to the far North, where Vaschel hoped the cold would retard the Creature’s healing. Grimly he regularly damaged the aleph as it healed. The Creature both started to heal more quickly and became harder to damage over time.
At last Vaschel’s gambit somewhat worked. Taking his creation further that most men dared, both of them ended up lost and frozen. For Vaschel, this was his true end. Those few who knew the true story assumed the same for the Creature.
Speaking of, the legend of the Creature was spoken of in some circles. This ultimately inspired Mary Shelley to write Frankenstein (the fact, like Wells, she wrote of a mystical creature as science fiction had no direct tie with Wells, other than they both were capturing the zeitgeist). In the Freud family it was a tale passed down and some generation later the legend inspired some thinking of Sigmund around how psychology was shaped by our feelings towards our parents (or creators).
Little did any of them know that as the years passed the Creature continued to heal slowly. Eventually it reanimated and managed to move south. Vaschel’s death had removed the Creature’s anger and desire for revenge. Sadly, this also removed much of the Creature’s purpose and it has wandered the world searching for…something. Anything, really, that would show that its existence had some purpose.
Immortal the Creature has survived until modern times. He has recently read that some interesting and new things are occurring in Austin and travels there. If he will be friend or foe to Morgan is yet to be determined. However the return of magic might just give him the purpose he has forever sought.
Role in the narrative: I was considering how to expand the Wells universe a bit. As prolific as H G Wells was, eventually one will run out of material. My first thought was to posit that Wells was a ghost writer for some contemporaries (e.g., Jules Verne). But I’ve likely stretched my gimmick/device to the breaking point already (Wells cast a spell that bound magical creatures told as SciFi). So, when I was thinking about this around Halloween, I decided that “Season 2” might be things not tied to Wells the character, but might be things that either simply survived or are being created anew by the return of magic lead by Morgan.
Abilities: The Creature is immortal, resistant to damage, and regenerates quickly. He is much stronger than an ordinary man. He is intelligent and knows a great deal of history (having lived it). However, his perspective on history doesn’t always match modern takes, his being more accurate (remember, history is written by the victors). He is also a fine handyman, picking up these skills to produce some income (he needs no food, and can survive well enough in most environments, so has little use for money). He has no particular fighting skills, having no need to develop them (being resistant to most harm and strong enough to pull people apart).
Inspirations: My first exposure to golems was Dungeons and Dragons (clay, iron, stone, and flesh). I claim no originality in seeing a tie between Frankenstein and the golem – many have written about this before I. In looking for a Jewish “Victor Frankenstein” I came up with “Vaschel Freud,” which made a nice tie to inspire some of Sigmund’s work (a little cheesy/groan-inducing I suppose, but I couldn’t resist). Lastly it was rather handy that the Wikipedia entry for golems suggested that Adam himself might have been one. Likely I overindulged in knitting all these things together but it was fun for me and likely nothing will ever come of these profiles anyway so I might as well enjoy J.